Sign in Subscribe

Fact Check: Lapid's "1,700 Shekels a Month" Is a 2,400% Lie

• 9 min read
Fact Check: Lapid's "1,700 Shekels a Month" Is a 2,400% Lie

Yair Lapid tells the country that every working family pays 1,700 shekels a month for Charedi "draft-dodging." A national fact-checking column examined the claim and stamped it "True." And now the leading expert on the Charedi economy in Israel, and a former research fellow of the very institute that produced the underlying study — has opened the fine print. The study's own numbers yield not 1,700 shekels, but roughly seventy-two shekels. That is not a rounding error. It is an exaggeration of nearly 2,400 percent, broadcast to an exhausted public as certified fact. Here is the full anatomy of a manufactured number — every figure below drawn from the study itself.

I. The Number That Launched a Thousand Op-Eds

You have heard the figure even if you never read the study. NIS 14.9 billion — the "security subsidy" the Charedi community supposedly receives every year by not serving. It is the crown jewel of the economic case against the Torah world: quoted in the Knesset, recycled in columns, compressed by Yair Lapid into the perfect kitchen-table grievance — "every working family in the country pays 1,700 shekels every month" for the Charedim. Globes' fact-checking column, HaMashrokit, examined that sentence and graded it "True."

The figure's power is its precision. It does not say "the Charedim are a burden" — that is mere opinion. It says here is the invoice, itemized, per family, per month. It converts a population of Jews into a line item on their neighbors' bills. Which is why what follows matters so much: because when the invoice is audited, it collapses.

III. The 87 Percent Trick

Begin with the finding that detonates everything else, because it appears — explicitly — inside the study itself.

The study states that if Charedi men enlisted at a rate similar to non-Charedi Jews — that is, if the "draft-dodging" ended almost entirely, tomorrow morning — the 14.9 billion would shrink by only 1.9 billion shekels. About 13 billion — 87 percent of the total — would remain even after near-total enlistment.

Stop and absorb the logic, because it is not complicated. A number that survives the solution cannot be the measure of the problem. If "the cost of Charedi non-enlistment" would still be 87 percent intact after the Charedim enlisted, then whatever that number measures, it is not the cost of Charedi non-enlistment. The study's headline figure and the study's own fine print are in open contradiction — and the entire public campaign has been built on the headline while the fine print sat unread.

IV. How to Manufacture 14.9 Billion

So if enlistment accounts for only 1.9 billion, where do the other 13 billion come from? The analysis traces the machinery, move by move.

Move one: the baby tax. The study's central component — 11.2 billion shekels — derives from the gap between the Charedim's share of the population and their share of tax payments, multiplied by the defense budget. The enlistment rate does not appear in this calculation at all. The study simply assumes that every person in Israel — every adult, every child, every newborn — "consumes" an identical share of the defense budget, and then bills each community accordingly. On this method, a Charedi infant owes the Ministry of Defense exactly what a forty-year-old hi-tech executive owes — and every shekel the infant's family cannot pay is booked as a "security subsidy." What this actually measures is that Charedi families have lower incomes, more children, and a younger age structure. Israel's tax system taxes income and consumption; it has never in its history billed each baby an equal share of the state. The study invents such a tax, observes that Charedim cannot pay it, and calls the difference a subsidy.

Move two: the allocation key. And even that 11.2 billion is not a fact — it is a choice. He notes that had the researchers divided the defense burden by households rather than by persons — an equally defensible convention — the central component would fall from 11.2 billion to roughly 3.2 billion. One methodological toggle, and two-thirds of the headline evaporates. A figure that swings by nine billion shekels depending on the researcher's preference is not a measurement. It is an assumption wearing a number's clothing.

Move three: the time machine. The study computes the Charedi share of tax payments from 2018–2019 data — and multiplies it against a high-end forecast of the defense budget for 2027–2034. Old tax figures from before the Charedi employment growth of recent years, spliced onto a projected future military budget inflated by the war. The gap is manufactured by the calendar itself.

Move four: the "hidden costs." The remainder bundles together shadow prices of mandatory service, projected future income losses, and estimated harm to employers. Inside this component, fully 1.4 billion shekels is attributed to Charedi women — who are exempt from service by law, exactly as every religious woman in Israel is — and roughly 400 million is attributed to employers. Nearly two billion shekels of the "cost of Charedi draft-dodging" has nothing to do with any Charedi man's enlistment decision at all.

And then comes the confession that should have ended the entire news cycle before it began: the study's own authors state that the figure is neither a loss of economic output nor an excess budgetary expenditure — and therefore must not be presented as money the state would save if Charedim enlisted. The authors said it. The politicians ignored it. The fact-checkers never looked.

V. The Fact-Checker Who Checked the Division, Not the Number

Which brings us to HaMashrokit — because the story of how "1,700 shekels" earned the stamp "True" deserves to be taught in journalism schools as a cautionary tale.

To verify Lapid's sentence, the column took the full 14.9 billion — the number whose own fine print says 87 percent of it has nothing to do with enlistment — and divided it. But not by the population Lapid named. Lapid said "every working family in the country": there are 2.198 million working households in Israel. HaMashrokit instead selected 880,000 households — only non-Charedi Jewish households, and only from the top four income deciles. With one stroke of the calculator, it erased 1.3 million working households from the country: every working Arab household, every working Charedi household (yes — Charedim who work and pay taxes were deleted from the ledger of who pays), and every working non-Charedi Jewish household in the bottom six deciles. To assemble even this construction, it spliced together two different studies with different methodologies — the 14.9 billion from the Israel Democracy Institute, the household group from a Kohelet Forum paper — and divided the sum equally among households that do not pay equal taxes, producing a hypothetical average no actual family pays.

And here is the crowning absurdity, the detailed analysis leaves gleaming on the table: after all of it — after adopting the inflated numerator whole, after deleting 1.3 million families from the denominator, after fusing incompatible studies — the calculation produced 1,420 shekels. Not 1,700. A twenty percent shortfall from the claim under examination. And the column graded Lapid's statement "True" anyway.

A fact-check that alters the facts until they approach the claim — and certifies the claim when they still fall twenty percent short — is not checking anything. It is notarizing.

VI. The Honest Arithmetic

Now watch how short the honest calculation is. Accept, for argument's sake, every one of the Israel Democracy Institute's assumptions — the baby tax, the time machine, all of it. Take the study's own stated figure for what Charedi male enlistment would actually change: 1.9 billion shekels. Divide it by the population Lapid himself named: all 2.198 million working households in Israel.

The result is roughly 72 shekels per household per month.

Not 1,700. Seventy-two — and that only by granting the study every contested assumption it makes. The gap between what was broadcast to the public and what the study's own fine print supports is a factor of twenty-four: an exaggeration of nearly 2,400 percent, carrying a fact-checker's seal. On the study's own numbers and HaMashrokit's own chosen data, the grade Lapid's claim deserved was the one the column exists to give: "Not True."

VII. Arithmetic as Incitement

Why does this matter beyond the pleasure of a demolition? Because of what the number was built to do.

The 1,700-shekel figure is not an economic statistic; it is a monthly grievance, hand-delivered to every stretched family in the country with a Charedi return address. It takes a society exhausted by war and hands it an itemized bill for its neighbors' existence — your overdraft, your reserve duty, your anger: here is who owes you. It is the financial twin of the manpower lie, and it has now met the same fate. The claim that the Charedim caused the soldier shortage collapsed under the testimony of the state's own people — Smotrich ("there is no greater lie"), MK Halevi with the discharge data, Ramon with the four thousand volunteers turned away, Maj. Sabo with the field numbers the High Court refused to hear for a single minute. And now the claim that the Charedim cost every family 1,700 shekels a month collapses under the study's own fine print, read aloud by a former fellow of the institute that wrote it. The two pillars of the campaign — they cost us our sons and they cost us our money — have both been examined, and both have failed. What remains standing is what we have documented all along: a campaign in search of a pretext, whose object was never the soldiers and never the shekels, but the community itself.

And permit us one bitter observation. The State of Israel stands justly bewildered that the world brands it with the monstrous libel of "genocide" — fabricated figures, laundered through official-sounding institutions, certified as fact, and repeated until believed. It should recognize the machinery, because it is precisely the machinery its own government and media have run against the Charedim for years: a manufactured number, an institute's letterhead, a fact-checker's stamp, a politician's megaphone. A state that wonders why lies about it are so easily certified abroad might ask why it certifies lies about its own Torah community at home — and might note, as we have documented, that the organization which published the "Genocide in Gaza" report keeps its tax-deductible status to this day, while the yeshivos lose theirs.

And one more thing, because it is our discipline and our difference: note what we did not do, and what we do not do. We did not answer their exaggeration with a counter-exaggeration. We did not invent a number in the other direction. We read their study, quoted their sentences, ran their arithmetic, and let the truth do the wounding. That is the Torah community's weapon in this war and the only one we will ever need — emes. Their case requires deleting 1.3 million families from a calculator. Ours requires reading the fine print out loud.

VIII. Keep the Number in Your Pocket

So here is the takeaway, small enough to carry. The next time someone at a Shabbos table, a comment section, or a Knesset podium repeats that every working family pays 1,700 shekels a month for the Charedim, you need exactly three sentences. The study behind that number says, explicitly, that full Charedi enlistment would change it by only 13 percent. The honest figure, on the study's own numbers, is about 72 shekels. And the study's own authors warn that the figure must not be presented as money the state would save. Then let the silence do its work.

Seventy-two shekels. Remember it — not because 72 is the true price of the Torah world, chas v'shalom; by our accounting, the Torah learned in Eretz Yisrael is the one asset holding everything else up, and it is beyond price. Remember it because it is the distance between what this campaign tells the public and what its own documents contain — a distance of 2,400 percent, which is the precise measurement of how badly they need the public not to read the fine print.

May Hashem, whose seal is emes, expose every false ledger raised against His people, bless the honest researchers who read the fine print, remove the manufactured grievances from between brothers, and speedily bring the day when the only accounting that matters — the zechus of Torah that shields this land — is revealed to every eye, bimheirah b'yameinu, amen.

Sources

The study's own figures, as documented in the analysis

  • The NIS 14.9 billion headline; the study's explicit statement that enlistment of Charedi men at non-Charedi Jewish rates would reduce the figure by only NIS 1.9 billion, leaving 87 percent intact; the NIS 11.2 billion component derived from the population-share/tax-share gap multiplied by the defense budget, with no enlistment variable; the per-capita allocation assumption, and the fall to roughly NIS 3.2 billion under a household-based key; the splicing of 2018–2019 tax data with a high-end 2027–2034 defense-budget forecast; the "hidden costs" component attributing NIS 1.4 billion to legally exempt Charedi women and roughly NIS 400 million to employers; and the authors' own caveat that the figure is neither an output loss nor an excess budgetary expenditure

The fact-check

  • Yair Lapid's claim that "every working family in the country pays 1,700 shekels every month"; the Globes "HaMashrokit" examination: the division of the full 14.9 billion among 880,000 non-Charedi Jewish households from the top four income deciles rather than Israel's 2.198 million working households; the exclusion of working Arab, Charedi, and lower-decile Jewish households; the splicing of the Israel Democracy Institute figure with a Kohelet Forum household grouping; the resulting NIS 1,420 — twenty percent short of the claim — and the grade of "True" nonetheless; and the honest result of the study's own enlistment figure divided among all working households: roughly NIS 72 per month

The structural relationship to other articles in this series